public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Perf ABI (was: Re: [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:27:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112162756.GA2540@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326383629.7642.85.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 10:39 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> > pipe()/pipe2()
> > dup()/dup2()/dup3()
> > umount()/umount2()
> > mmap()/mmap2()
> > madvise()/madvise1()
> > eventfd()/eventfd2()
> > 
> > Those look very much like major version numbers to me. And these are
> > entirely compatible with your statement above about using -ENOSYS to
> > detect if the major version number is implemented or not.
> 
> That's a stretch in calling version numbers. All but the madvise case
> above are how many parameters it takes, not really a "version" number.
> 
> It's adding a new syscall, not updating a version and then deprecating
> the old one. As I believe all the above are still supported.
> 
> > 
> > If your only concern is that the major version number should be part of
> > the ABI name (as in the examples above), that can be arranged.
> 
> > > 
> > > We've done this without version numbers. Just look at all the udev
> > > changes.
> > 
> > Are you seriously refering to udev as an example of how to handle
> > changes, or as one of the worse ABI breakage mess that happened in the
> > Linux kernel history ? My own experience as a Linux users (in the
> > era around 2.6.12 kernels if my memory serves me right) lead me to think
> > it's the latter. And because udev is part of the runtime support, that
> > indeed led to non-bootable systems and lots of frustrated users.
> 
> Yeah, I know it sucked, as I got burned by it too. But having "version"
> numbers wouldn't have helped at all. In fact, it should have kept both
> ways working much longer, or at least had the new udev support both. 
> 
> What udev did is more like what you want to do than what I did with
> trace-cmd.

OK. Then how can trace-cmd support the LTTng features ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-12 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1322775683-8741-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: export vmalloc_sync_all symbol to GPL modules Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 22:13     ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:19       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:41         ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 23:00         ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] fs/splice: export splice_to_pipe " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-02  7:19   ` Jens Axboe
2011-12-02 12:32     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 22:04     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 22:15         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:36           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-02 13:51               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 23:18             ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 23:47               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:14     ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:20       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 23:17         ` Greg KH
2011-12-05 14:17           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 21:44             ` Greg KH
2011-12-08  5:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-08 23:27                 ` Greg KH
2011-12-19 10:49                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 15:30                     ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-20 11:08                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 21:46                         ` Frank Rowand
2011-12-23 10:51                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 18:47                         ` Aaron Spear
2011-12-21 18:58                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-23 16:46                         ` Perf ABI (was: Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules) Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-23 17:21                           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-12-23 18:16                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-25 17:46                               ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-12 14:09                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-12 14:54                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 15:39                                     ` [lttng-dev] Perf ABI (was: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-12 15:53                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 15:59                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 16:27                                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2012-01-12 16:34                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 20:00                                       ` Greg KH
2012-01-16  8:55                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-07 22:57             ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-08  5:40               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120112162756.GA2540@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox