From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758700Ab2AMSTy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:19:54 -0500 Received: from e24smtp04.br.ibm.com ([32.104.18.25]:39887 "EHLO e24smtp04.br.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758646Ab2AMSTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:19:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:17:06 -0200 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: Roland Dreier Cc: venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds_rdma: don't assume infiniband device is PCI Message-ID: <20120113181706.GA3904@oc1711230544.ibm.com> References: <1325714596-4655-1-git-send-email-cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) x-cbid: 12011318-8936-0000-0000-0000059F3E17 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:49:36AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Looks great to me: > > And BTW if Oracle has some non-published work they should probably just > rebase it on top of this fix. We should merge this rather than shipping a > kernel with an obvious know crash like this. > > - R. > Hi, Roland. Sorry that I didn't include you. Should I include the infiniband users under net/ in the files that Infiniband maintainers take care of? David, Is this going through your tree? In patchwork, its state is "Not Applicable". Thanks. Cascardo.