public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Store SRAT revision
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:52:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120115215237.GA10124@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120115213407.GU12380@tpkurt2.garloff.de>

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch stores the SRAT table revision for later consumption
> by arch specific __init functions.
> 
> 
> This is patch 1/3.
> -- 
> Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>  [Koeln/Greven]
> 

> From: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
> Subject: Store SRAT table revision
> References: bnc#503038
> 
> In SRAT v1, we had 8bit proximity domain (PXM) fields; SRAT v2 provides
> 32bits for these. The new fields were reserved before.
> According to the ACPI spec, the OS must disregrard reserved fields.
> In order to know whether or not, we must know what version the SRAT
> table has.
> 
> This patch stores the SRAT table revision for later consumption
> by arch specific __init functions.
> 
> This is patch 1/3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa.c      |    3 +++
>  include/acpi/acpi_numa.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-15 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-15 21:30 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI SRAT: Disregard reserved PXM bits Kurt Garloff
2012-01-15 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/3]: Store SRAT revision Kurt Garloff
2012-01-15 21:52   ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-01-17  9:24   ` Len Brown
2012-01-17 13:20     ` Kurt Garloff
2012-01-15 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/3]: x86-64: Handle SRAT v1 and v2 consistently Kurt Garloff
2012-01-15 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/3]: Consider SRAT rev on ia64 Kurt Garloff
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-18  9:33 [PATCH 0/3]: Discard reserved PXM bits for SRAT v1 Kurt Garloff
2009-05-18  9:46 ` [PATCH 1/3]: Store SRAT revision Kurt Garloff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120115215237.GA10124@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kurt@garloff.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox