linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:52:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost> (raw)

Hi,

I have created the following RFC patch based on the recent discussions
and consensus on simplifying the power aware scheduler in the kernel.

Ref: LWN: Rethinking power-aware scheduling
     http://lwn.net/Articles/474915/

The goal of the unified tunable are as follows:

* Simple and single tunable for different (all) topology
* Good default powersavings for kernel
* Potential to map this setting to other subsystems like cpufreq and
  cpuidle    

What this patch does: (first step)

* Create a single sched_powersavings tunable in sysfs
* Enable current sched_mc and sched_smt features based on 
  value of this single tunable

What this patch is yet to do:

* Tune the default power savings to pack packages only till
  a threshold of say 50%
* Add notifiers to change setting on battery/AC transitions
* Feed the thresholds from arch specific code so that different archs
  can do 'optimal' packing based on topology  
* May be move this to /sys/device/system/powersavings and add additional
  platform tunables like x86_energy_perf_policy?

This RFC has only x86 changes and has been tested on dual-socket,
quad-core,HT configuration.

Please let me know your comments and feedback.

Thanks,
Vaidy

---

Vaidyanathan Srinivasan (2):
      sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable
      sched: fix group_capacity for thread level consolidation


 arch/x86/Kconfig          |   20 ++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    2 +
 block/blk.h               |   11 ++++---
 drivers/base/cpu.c        |    2 +
 include/linux/sched.h     |   29 +++++++++--------
 include/linux/topology.h  |    9 +----
 kernel/sched/core.c       |   75 +++++++++++----------------------------------
 kernel/sched/fair.c       |   38 ++++++++++++++++-------
 8 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2012-01-16 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-16 16:22 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 10:42     ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 11:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 11:26         ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:13             ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-28 12:06             ` [tip:sched/core] sched, block: Unify cache detection tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:35     ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:16     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-25 15:12     ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-01-25 15:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:22     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-27  9:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] sched: fix group_capacity for thread level consolidation Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:10     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-17 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).