From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751964Ab2AQBtc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:49:32 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:40235 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751649Ab2AQBtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:49:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:49:27 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Fubo Chen Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: New very basic kernel selftests directory Message-ID: <20120117014924.GC24200@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1322840475-19553-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:54:27PM +0000, Fubo Chen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Bring a new kernel selftests directory in tools/testing/selftests. > > Interesting ... but why to invent a test framework from scratch while > there already exists stuff like googletest or TAP::Harness ? We wanted to start with something very simple that just launch selftests in batch. Let's see first where this goes, if this becomes a useful subsystem that grows up, then if it makes sense to rely on some more elaborated selftest framework we can think about it.