From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754487Ab2AQSoX (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:44:23 -0500 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:48326 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159Ab2AQSoW (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:44:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:14:10 +0530 From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan To: Vincent Guittot , Peter Zijlstra , Indan Zupancic , Youquan Song , Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Ven , Suresh Siddha Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables Message-ID: <20120117184410.GB14239@dirshya.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) x-cbid: 12011718-5816-0000-0000-000000E92BEE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [2012-01-16 21:52:26]: > Hi, > > I have created the following RFC patch based on the recent discussions > and consensus on simplifying the power aware scheduler in the kernel. > > Ref: LWN: Rethinking power-aware scheduling > http://lwn.net/Articles/474915/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/10/61