public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	"Igor M. Liplianin" <liplianin@me.by>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] [media] ds3000: off by one in ds3000_read_snr()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:33:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119093327.GI3356@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F16FC26.80306@bfs.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1634 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:06:46PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 17.01.2012 08:30, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > This is a static checker patch and I don't have the hardware to test
> > this, so please review it carefully.  The dvbs2_snr_tab[] array has 80
> > elements so when we cap it at 80, that's off by one.  I would have
> > assumed that the test was wrong but in the lines right before we have
> > the same test but use "snr_reading - 1" as the array offset.  I've done
> > the same thing here.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/ds3000.c b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/ds3000.c
> > index af65d01..3f5ae0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/ds3000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/ds3000.c
> > @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int ds3000_read_snr(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u16 *snr)
> >  			snr_reading = dvbs2_noise_reading / tmp;
> >  			if (snr_reading > 80)
> >  				snr_reading = 80;
> > -			*snr = -(dvbs2_snr_tab[snr_reading] / 1000);
> > +			*snr = -(dvbs2_snr_tab[snr_reading - 1] / 1000);
> >  		}
> >  		dprintk("%s: raw / cooked = 0x%02x / 0x%04x\n", __func__,
> >  				snr_reading, *snr);
> 
> hi dan,
> 
> perhaps it is more useful to do it in the check above ?

It looks like the check is correct but we need to shift all the
values by one.  Again, I don't have this hardware, I'm just going by
the context.

> thinking about that why not replace the number (80) with ARRAY_SIZE() ?

That would be a cleanup, yes but it could go in a separate patch.

regards,
dan carpenter


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-19  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-17  7:30 [patch 2/2] [media] ds3000: off by one in ds3000_read_snr() Dan Carpenter
2012-01-18 17:06 ` walter harms
2012-01-19  9:33   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-01-19 10:26     ` walter harms
2012-01-19 12:22       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-01-21 15:58         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120119093327.GI3356@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liplianin@me.by \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox