From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] blkcg: kill the mind-bending blkg->dev
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:46:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119164641.GA15561@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120119163056.GH5198@google.com>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:30:56AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:49:19AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > Let stat and conf read functions get device name from
> > > blkg->q->backing_dev_info.dev and pass it down to printing functions
> > > and remove blkg->dev.
> >
> > I think one of the reasons for not using blkg->q->backing_dev_info.dev was
> > that there were still drivers where multiple gendisks were sharing the
> > request queue.
>
> Hmmm... is that relevant? The configurations / stats are per
> cgroup-request_queue pair. How does multiple genhd's sharing a queue
> make any difference? Also, the fill_dev_details functions were using
> the same q->backing_dev_info to fill it in, so it's not like it was
> using anything different.
You are right. Looks like it should not make any difference. Also looks
like bdi->dev points to first disk on the queue and ignores later ones.
int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent,
const char *fmt, ...)
{
if (bdi->dev) /* The driver needs to use separate queues per
device */
return 0;
}
So if a queue is being shared by multiple disks, then any throttling rule
on the device will practically trated a rule on the queue and will be
effective on all the devices cumulatively. So sounds fine.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-19 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 1:11 [PATCHSET] blkcg: kill policy node and blkg->dev Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 01/12] blkcg: obtaining blkg should be enclosed inside rcu_read_lock() Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 10:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:39 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 15:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 02/12] cfq: don't register propio policy if !CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 10:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] elevator: clear auxiliary data earlier during elevator switch Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] elevator: make elevator_init_fn() return 0/-errno Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 11:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] blkcg: update blkg get functions take blkio_cgroup as parameter Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 11:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] blkcg: use q and plid instead of opaque void * for blkio_group association Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] blkcg: add blkio_policy[] array and allow one policy per policy ID Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] blkcg: use the usual get blkg path for root blkio_group Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 14:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] blkcg: factor out blkio_group creation Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] blkcg: don't allow or retain configuration of missing devices Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 11/12] blkcg: kill blkio_policy_node Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 22:03 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 22:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 1:11 ` [PATCH 12/12] blkcg: kill the mind-bending blkg->dev Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 15:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:46 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-01-19 1:18 ` [PATCHSET] blkcg: kill policy node and blkg->dev Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120119164641.GA15561@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).