From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Hughes <john@atlantech.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: [Sony Vaio TX3] TPM chip prevents machine from suspending a second time
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:01:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120121170157.GA18053@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D91157F.2020502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Stefan et al,
John Hughes wrote[1]:
> On a sony vaio tx3 when tpm_tis is loaded suspend only works once.
[...]
> dmesg shows
>
> [ 1859.244142] legacy_suspend(): pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x57 returns 38
> [ 1859.244150] PM: Device 00:07 failed to suspend: error 38
> [ 1859.456685] PM: Some devices failed to suspend
Stefan Berger wrote, in response to a similar report[2]:
> Ok, so this error code means TPM_INVALID_POSTINIT (not a posix
> code) and means that this command was received in the wrong sequence
> relative to a TPM_Startup command. Well, what's supposed to be
> happening is this:
>
> When the machines (S3) suspends then the OS needs to send a
> TPM_SaveState() to the TPM. This is done by the Linux driver. Once
> the VM resumes, the BIOS is supposed to send a TPM_Startup(ST_STATE)
> to the TPM.
>
> Now the fun starts when a BIOS isn't doing that (even though the
> spec says it's supposed to)
[...]
> I could try
> to send you a small tool that you would have to run from user space
> upon resume so that we can see that this error goes away. If that's
> verified we could subsequently write a patch for the TPM driver to
> also send the TPM_Startup(ST_STATE) to the TPM, which then in the
> case of most BIOSes would be the 2nd time that the TPM receives such
> a command. I think TPMs should be able to digest this 2nd
> TPM_Startup() well, but I'd have to check -- but really we would
> ill-fix it just because of one (possibly) buggy BIOS.
The tool is at [3]. John verified that the tool gets suspend working
reliably on his machine.
[...]
> Well, we now could (once) probe the TPM after the resume and send a test
> command to it and see whether it returns error code 38 and if so send
> the TPM_Startup() from the driver -- as a work-around for your broken BIOS.
Versions tested and found to exhibit the problem:
- Debian 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 (close to v2.6.35-rc6)
- Debian 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 (close to v2.6.36)
- Debian 2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.3 (close to v2.6.37-rc5)
- Debian 2.6.37-1 (close to v2.6.37)
- v3.2-rc2 + Vaio keyboard fixes
- Debian 3.2.1-1 (close to v3.2.1)
- v3.3-rc1 + Vaio keyboard fixes
Known problem? Any hints for getting this to work out of the box? (If
there's no generic fix, maybe it would be possible to use a quirks
table of some kind?)
Thanks,
Jonathan
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/591031
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1119143/focus=1119476
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1119143/focus=1119495
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-21 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 14:08 TPM chip prevents machine from suspending Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 17:25 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-28 18:12 ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 19:45 ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 19:57 ` Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-28 20:16 ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 20:32 ` Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-28 23:10 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29 0:19 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29 12:08 ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-29 12:25 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29 12:30 ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-29 14:30 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-03-29 15:03 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-30 19:43 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Eric Paris
2012-01-21 17:01 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-01-23 20:52 ` [Sony Vaio TX3] TPM chip prevents machine from suspending a second time Stefan Berger
2012-01-29 10:49 ` John Hughes
2012-01-29 18:22 ` Stefan Berger
2012-01-30 9:10 ` John Hughes
2012-02-26 15:44 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-03 15:34 ` John Hughes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120121170157.GA18053@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=john@atlantech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox