public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Hughes <john@atlantech.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: [Sony Vaio TX3] TPM chip prevents machine from suspending a second time
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:01:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120121170157.GA18053@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D91157F.2020502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Stefan et al,

John Hughes wrote[1]:

> On a sony vaio tx3 when tpm_tis is loaded suspend only works once. 
[...]
> dmesg shows
>
> [ 1859.244142] legacy_suspend(): pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x57 returns 38
> [ 1859.244150] PM: Device 00:07 failed to suspend: error 38
> [ 1859.456685] PM: Some devices failed to suspend

Stefan Berger wrote, in response to a similar report[2]:

> Ok, so this error code means TPM_INVALID_POSTINIT  (not a posix
> code) and means that this command was received in the wrong sequence
> relative to a TPM_Startup command. Well, what's supposed to be
> happening is this:
>
> When the machines (S3) suspends then the OS needs to send a
> TPM_SaveState() to the TPM. This is done by the Linux driver. Once
> the VM resumes, the BIOS is supposed to send a TPM_Startup(ST_STATE)
> to the TPM.
>
> Now the fun starts when a BIOS isn't doing that (even though the
> spec says it's supposed to)
[...]
>                                                        I could try
> to send you a small tool that you would have to run from user space
> upon resume so that we can see that this error goes away. If that's
> verified we could subsequently write a patch for the TPM driver to
> also send the TPM_Startup(ST_STATE) to the TPM, which then in the
> case of most BIOSes would be the 2nd time that the TPM receives such
> a command. I think TPMs should be able to digest this 2nd
> TPM_Startup() well, but I'd have to check -- but really we would
> ill-fix it just because of one (possibly) buggy BIOS.

The tool is at [3].  John verified that the tool gets suspend working
reliably on his machine.

[...]
> Well, we now could (once) probe the TPM after the resume and send a test 
> command to it and see whether it returns error code 38 and if so send 
> the TPM_Startup() from the driver -- as a work-around for your broken BIOS.

Versions tested and found to exhibit the problem:

 - Debian 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1 (close to v2.6.35-rc6)
 - Debian 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 (close to v2.6.36)
 - Debian 2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.3 (close to v2.6.37-rc5)
 - Debian 2.6.37-1 (close to v2.6.37)
 - v3.2-rc2 + Vaio keyboard fixes
 - Debian 3.2.1-1 (close to v3.2.1)
 - v3.3-rc1 + Vaio keyboard fixes

Known problem?  Any hints for getting this to work out of the box?  (If
there's no generic fix, maybe it would be possible to use a quirks
table of some kind?)

Thanks,
Jonathan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/591031
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1119143/focus=1119476
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1119143/focus=1119495

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-21 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-28 14:08 TPM chip prevents machine from suspending Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 17:25 ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-28 18:12   ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 19:45     ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 19:57       ` Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-28 20:16         ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-28 20:32           ` Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-28 23:10       ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29  0:19         ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29 12:08         ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-29 12:25           ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-29 12:30             ` Jeff Layton
2011-03-29 14:30             ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-03-29 15:03               ` Stefan Berger
2011-03-30 19:43                 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Eric Paris
2012-01-21 17:01         ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-01-23 20:52           ` [Sony Vaio TX3] TPM chip prevents machine from suspending a second time Stefan Berger
2012-01-29 10:49             ` John Hughes
2012-01-29 18:22               ` Stefan Berger
2012-01-30  9:10                 ` John Hughes
2012-02-26 15:44                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-03 15:34                     ` John Hughes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120121170157.GA18053@burratino \
    --to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=john@atlantech.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox