From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752802Ab2AWJ07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:26:59 -0500 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:58163 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752516Ab2AWJ06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:26:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:26:24 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition Message-ID: <20120123092624.GA11983@arm.com> References: <1327081352-13178-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <1327310131.2446.1.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1327310131.2446.1.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing > > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of > > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the > > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to > > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1. > > > > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that > > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can > > merge it via rmk (with your ack)? > > I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I > can stack some other patches on top. In which case I would need Russell's acked-by. Thanks. -- Catalin