From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754349Ab2AWWPu (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:50 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38177 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753530Ab2AWWPu (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:11:55 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cascardo@holoscopio.com, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcache fix for 3.3-rc1. Message-ID: <20120123221155.GA10265@suse.de> References: <1327355540-30681-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1327355540-30681-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:52:19PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey Greg, > > I posted this patch some time ago [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/13/253] > but I am not seeing it in you tree. Did you copy me on it? I don't see it anywhere in my to-apply queues. > Was wondering if you could stick this patch in your tree? It fixes > a performance regressions which is quite noticable in small memory systems > where a 'swapoff' ends up taking more than it should. So this is needed for 3.3? How about older kernels? 3.2? 3.0? thanks, greg k-h