From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754678Ab2AWWmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:42:54 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:22673 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754017Ab2AWWmx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:42:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:40:27 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cascardo@holoscopio.com, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcache fix for 3.3-rc1. Message-ID: <20120123224027.GA32647@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1327355540-30681-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20120123221155.GA10265@suse.de> <20120123222238.GB31852@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120123223508.GA10729@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120123223508.GA10729@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4F1DE266.003E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:35:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:22:38PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:11:55PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:52:19PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > Hey Greg, > > > > > > > > I posted this patch some time ago [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/13/253] > > > > but I am not seeing it in you tree. > > > > > > Did you copy me on it? I don't see it anywhere in my to-apply queues. > > > > Ugh, I did not - I seemed to have forgotten to CC you and had assumed you > > would be omnipresent and would magically pick it up. Sorry about that mishap. > > Hm, I must be slipping, I should have caught that :) Tsk tsk .. :-) > > > > > Was wondering if you could stick this patch in your tree? It fixes > > > > a performance regressions which is quite noticable in small memory systems > > > > where a 'swapoff' ends up taking more than it should. > > > > > > So this is needed for 3.3? How about older kernels? 3.2? 3.0? > > > > That would be splendid if you could stick it on the stable tree :-) > > Which one(s)? 3.2 please.