From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932542Ab2AXDET (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:04:19 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:57750 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932385Ab2AXDEN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:04:13 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: RvwT9bjcjdymma0Jq/a1b2z1+DyURV1JaZ/EZlrJhqVJ 1327374252 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:03:35 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, gwingerde@gmail.com, larry.finger@lwfinger.net, davem@davemloft.net, bhutchings@solarflare.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: misc: Remove MISC_DEVICES config option Message-ID: <20120124030335.GA15514@kroah.com> References: <1325796541-11402-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <20120106050355.GA7633@kroah.com> <201201061200.44183.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:57:36AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I think that is true for the majority of stuff we have under drivers/misc > > anyway. I had done the same patch that Fabio sent a couple of months ago > > but then forgot about it, so here is a wholehearted > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > for the new patch. It fixes a real problem, and we applied a similar patch > > in drivers/mfd as 8a0a8e8e already. We probably still want to find a better > > home for drivers that frequently get selected by other subsystems as you > > said, but that is an independent issue. I don't see why anyone would > > need a way to disable all MISC drivers at once, when the only thing that > > (in theory) connects them is that they are all different from everything > > else. > > Do you have any objections about this patch? Yes, I said my problems with it, I don't recall it being resent afterward, with any changes. greg k-h