linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v4
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:22:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126152257.bfba0c25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327447541-3040-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:25:41 -0800
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> wrote:

> Kernel's notion of possible cpus (from include/linux/cpumask.h)
>  *     cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable
> 
>  *  The cpu_possible_mask is fixed at boot time, as the set of CPU id's
>  *  that it is possible might ever be plugged in at anytime during the
>  *  life of that system boot.
> 
>  #define num_possible_cpus()     cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
> 
> and on x86 cpumask_weight() calls hweight64 and hweight64 (on older kernels
> and systems with !X86_FEATURE_POPCNT) or a popcnt based alternative.
> 
> i.e, We needlessly go through this mask based calculation everytime
> num_possible_cpus() is called.
> 
> The problem is there with cpu_online_mask() as well, which is fixed value at
> boot time in !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU case and should not change that often even
> in HOTPLUG case.
> 
> Though most of the callers of these two routines are init time (with few
> exceptions of runtime calls), it is cleaner to use variables
> and not go through this repeated mask based calculation.
>
> ...
>
> +extern int nr_online_cpus;
> +extern int nr_possible_cpus;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
>  /* Assuming NR_CPUS is huge, a runtime limit is more efficient.  Also,
>   * not all bits may be allocated. */
> @@ -81,8 +84,10 @@ extern const struct cpumask *const cpu_present_mask;
>  extern const struct cpumask *const cpu_active_mask;
>  
>  #if NR_CPUS > 1
> -#define num_online_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask)
> -#define num_possible_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
> +
> +#define num_online_cpus()	(nr_online_cpus)
> +#define num_possible_cpus()	(nr_possible_cpus)

This changes the return types from "unsigned int" to int.  Worse, the
return types become dependent upon CONFIG_SMP.

s/int/unsigned int/g, methinks.

>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -604,16 +604,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_all_bits);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_INIT_ALL_POSSIBLE
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_possible_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS) __read_mostly
>  	= CPU_BITS_ALL;
> +int nr_possible_cpus __read_mostly = NR_CPUS;

It looks strange to see cpu_possible_bits using CONFIG_NR_CPUS whereas
nr_possible_cpus uses NR_CPUS.  I suggest using CONFIG_NR_CPUS for
both.

Aside: that FIXME in include/linux/threads.h should get fixed - it's
stupid.  We should fix the Kconfigs.

And the legacy NR_CPUS should be banished from the kernel altogether.

>  #else
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_possible_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
> +int nr_possible_cpus __read_mostly;
>  #endif
>  const struct cpumask *const cpu_possible_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_possible_bits);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_mask);
>  
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_possible_cpus);

It's better to place the export immediately following the nr_possible_cpus
definition(s).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-26 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-18  2:07 [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-18  5:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-18 18:52   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-18 19:20     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-19 20:01       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:40         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-21  1:01           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:43         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-20 23:09           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-20 23:45             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-20 23:55               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-23  5:22                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-23 19:28                   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24  2:34                     ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v3 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-24 19:22                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-24 19:30                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-24 21:01                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24 23:25                           ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v4 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-26 17:22                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 17:27                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 21:25                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-26 23:22                             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-27 23:58                               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-01  0:17                                 ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-01 22:01                                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 20:03                                     ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-02 20:19                                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 21:00                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 19:54                                       ` Tony Luck
2012-02-13 20:04                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:25                                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:43                                           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:55                                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:44                                           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 21:57                                             ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14  9:25                                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-14 21:35                                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-14 23:00                                                   ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14 22:49                                                 ` [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup raw handling of online/possible map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 1/3] hexagon: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 2/3] mips: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map/cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 22:19                                                     ` David Daney
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 3/3] um: Avoid raw handling of cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 21:55                                   ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 David Daney
2012-02-27 22:07                                     ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-27 22:16                                       ` David Daney
2012-03-01 18:32                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-28  5:01                                       ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120126152257.bfba0c25.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).