From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754126Ab2A0Skx (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:40:53 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56132 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752950Ab2A0SkM (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:40:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:40:05 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Andi Kleen Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Emelyanov , KOSAKI Motohiro , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrey Vagin , KOSAKI Motohiro , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Glauber Costa , Tejun Heo , Matt Helsley , Pekka Enberg , Eric Dumazet , Vasiliy Kulikov , Alexey Dobriyan , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [RFC c/r 2/4] [RFC] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v7 Message-ID: <20120127184005.GH11086@moon> References: <20120127175342.273260614@openvz.org> <20120127175939.795551339@openvz.org> <20120127181525.GD11715@one.firstfloor.org> <20120127182403.GG11086@moon> <20120127183155.GE11715@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120127183155.GE11715@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:31:55PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:03PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Sure, I'll try to (btw, where I should send it to? And in which > > format novadays mans are written? In plain old troff or some > > human readable asciidocs?) And... should I post man page > > on LKML as well? > > Manpages are written in troff with -man and you would add the ASCII output > of the manpage to the commit log and send the troff source at some > point to linux-man. > OK, I see, thanks. > The basic problem is if this interface is at the right level of abstraction. > I have some doubts on that. It seems like a long term maintenance nightmare to > me. It may be better to put the loop that would call this into the kernel. > Hmm, ie selftest right in kenel? > > > > Hmm.. Andi, I seem not following. And? > > It just doesn't seem like a very useful thing to compare. I see. Cyrill