From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752745Ab2A1LAn (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:00:43 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:45939 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752061Ab2A1LAm (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:00:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:00:36 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Clemens Ladisch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace() Message-ID: <20120128110034.GD3391@somewhere> References: <20120128105246.GA25092@elgon.mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120128105246.GA25092@elgon.mountain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:52:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking. If > "task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later. We > can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have: > if (!task) > task = current; > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > if (!stack) { > if (regs) > stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp; > - else if (task && task != current) > + else if (task != current) > stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp; > else > stack = &dummy;