From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kay.sievers@vrfy.org, bp@amd64.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1'
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201291022.09258.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120123180601.GA24553@phenom.dumpdata.com>
I created a Bugzilla entry at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42683
for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there, thanks!
On poniedziałek, 23 stycznia 2012 o 19:06:01 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> When I bring a CPU down in a guest (which should be the same as bringing a
> CPU down using the ACPI framework), I get this:
>
> [ 14.484206] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> [ 14.514287] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 14.514318] WARNING: at /home/konrad/linux-linus/drivers/base/core.c:194
> device_release+0x82/0x90() [ 14.514354] Device 'cpu1' does not have a
> release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. [ 14.514386] Modules
> linked in: radeon fbcon tileblit font ttm bitblit softcursor
> drm_kms_helper xen_blkfront xen_netfront xen_fbfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt
> sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs xen_privcmd [ 14.514557] Pid:
> 22, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1 #1
> [ 14.514586] Call Trace:
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810897fa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810898d1>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813dea02>] device_release+0x82/0x90
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfb85>] kobject_release+0x45/0x90
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfa4c>] kobject_put+0x2c/0x60
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813de6a2>] put_device+0x12/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813df409>] device_unregister+0x19/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813e4edf>] unregister_cpu+0x4f/0x80
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff81052c7c>] arch_unregister_cpu+0x1c/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137f787>] handle_vcpu_hotplug_event+0xc7/0xd0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b900>] xenwatch_thread+0xb0/0x180
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810ad3f0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b850>] ? split+0xf0/0xf0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810acd16>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8160cc80>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> [ 14.515094] ---[ end trace 8f70af51a2e2611f ]---
>
> Looking at "commit e032d80774315869aa2285b217fdbbfed86c0b49
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> Date: Mon Jan 16 14:40:28 2012 -0800
>
> mce: fix warning messages about static struct mce_device
> "
>
> it looks like the corret fix is to make the 'cpu_devices' in
> arch/x86/kernel/topology.c to be changed to be more dynamic
> (or perhaps have an empty release function)?
>
> Is anybody else hitting this with ACPI CPU hot-unplug? Or do I have
> the privilige of being the first? Oh, I hadn't done a full bisection
> but v3.2 does not have this.
>
> The guest config is quite simple:
> extra="console=hvc0 debug earlyprintk=xen memblock=debug"
> kernel="/mnt/lab/bootstrap-x86_64/vmlinuz"
> ramdisk="/mnt/lab/bootstrap-x86_64/initramfs.cpio.gz"
> memory=1024
> maxmem=2048
> vcpus=2
> name="bootstrap-x86_64"
> on_crash="preserve"
> vfb = [ 'vnc=1, vnclisten=0.0.0.0,vncunused=1']
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.mrutecki.pl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-29 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 18:06 WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1' Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 18:13 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:06 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:22 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-27 0:53 ` Greg KH
2012-01-29 9:22 ` Maciej Rutecki [this message]
2012-02-01 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-02-02 17:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-02 18:38 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201291022.09258.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--to=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox