public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: Bad SSD performance with recent kernels
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130140537.GA20349@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130140109.GA15682@localhost>

> - IO size is 256KB (which is not a problem in itself)
> 
> - The dispatch/complete pattern is
> 
>         submit IO for range 1
>         complete IO for range 1
>         <dd busy, disk idle>
>         submit IO for range 2
>         complete IO for range 2
> 
>   So we have periods that no IO is in flight at all, which leads to
>   under-utilized disk (which should show up in iostat as <100% disk util)
> 
> # grep '[DC]' blktrace
> 
>   8,16   1   770606     9.990039807  4580  D   R 4379392 + 512 (   14826) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770607     9.991083069     0  C   R 4379392 + 512 ( 1043262) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   770739     9.991647434  4580  D   R 4379904 + 512 (   14433) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770740     9.992693317     0  C   R 4379904 + 512 ( 1045883) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   770872     9.993256451  4580  D   R 4380416 + 512 (   14539) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770873     9.994299156     0  C   R 4380416 + 512 ( 1042705) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771005     9.994863680  4580  D   R 4380928 + 512 (   14344) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771006     9.995909291     0  C   R 4380928 + 512 ( 1045611) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771138     9.996470460  4580  D   R 4381440 + 512 (   14043) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771139     9.997514205     0  C   R 4381440 + 512 ( 1043745) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771271     9.998077269  4580  D   R 4381952 + 512 (   14928) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771272     9.999120396     0  C   R 4381952 + 512 ( 1043127) [0]

Some better pattern for comparison:

  8,0    1    42940     0.990199812  4084  D   R 1432808 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    1    42941     0.990858326     0  C   R 1432552 + 256 [0]
  8,0    1    43009     0.991192107  4084  D   R 1433064 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    3    14691     0.991853319     0  C   R 1432808 + 256 [0]
  8,0    3    14759     0.992189451  4084  D   R 1433320 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    1    43010     0.994473159     0  C   R 1433064 + 256 [0]

Where the life time for requests 1432808, 1432552, 1433064, ...
are *interleaved* so that the disk always has something to do.

Thanks,
Fengguang

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-27  6:00 Bad SSD performance with recent kernels Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-27  6:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-28 12:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-28 13:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29  5:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29  8:42       ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-29  9:28         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 10:03       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29 11:16         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 13:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29 15:52             ` Pádraig Brady
2012-01-29 16:10             ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 20:15               ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30 11:18                 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 12:34                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30 14:01                     ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 14:05                       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2012-01-30  3:17               ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  5:31                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30  5:45                   ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  7:13                 ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30  7:22                   ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  7:36                     ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30  8:12                       ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30 10:31                         ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30 14:28                           ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 14:51                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30 22:26                               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31  0:14                                 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31  1:07                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31  3:00                                     ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31  2:17                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31  8:46                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31  6:36                             ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30 14:48         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-28 17:01   ` Herbert Poetzl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120130140537.GA20349@localhost \
    --to=wfg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox