linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char random: fix boot id uniqueness race
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:25:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120131162505.GA8298@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120131155955.GA24356@thunk.org>

* Ted Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:40:12PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/drivers/char/random.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
> > @@ -1231,6 +1231,8 @@ static int min_read_thresh = 8, min_writ
> >  static int max_read_thresh = INPUT_POOL_WORDS * 32;
> >  static int max_write_thresh = INPUT_POOL_WORDS * 32;
> >  static char sysctl_bootid[16];
> > +static int boot_id_generated;
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(boot_id_mutex);

Hi Ted,

> 
> My preference would be to put these statics in proc_do_uuid(), but
> that's arguably a nit.

No problem, can do.

> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		if (unlikely(!ACCESS_ONCE(boot_id_generated))) {
> > +			mutex_lock(&boot_id_mutex);
> > +			if (!boot_id_generated) {
> > +				generate_random_uuid(uuid);
> > +				/* Store uuid before boot_id_generated. */
> > +				smp_wmb();
> > +				boot_id_generated = 1;
> > +			}
> > +			mutex_unlock(&boot_id_mutex);
> > +		} else {
> > +			/* Load boot_id_generated before uuid */
> > +			smp_rmb();
> > +		}
> > +	}
> 
> I don't believe the smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() are necessary here; the
> mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() should put the necessary memory
> barriers in place.

The need for memory barriers is a consequence of letting the fast-path
run without holding this mutex.

Here is the race dealt with by the smp_rmb()/smp_wmb(). I'm showing the
result of reversed write order here:

CPU A                             CPU B

Load boot_id_generated            
  (test -> false)
mutex_lock(&boot_id_mutex)
  (implied memory barrier
   with acquire semantic)
Load boot_id_generated again
  (test -> false)
boot_id_generated = 1
  (both the compiler and
   CPU are free to reorder
   the boot_id_generated
   store before uuid stores)
                                  Load boot_id_generated
                                    (test -> true)
                                  Load uuid content
                                    (races with generate_random_uuid:
                                     result either 0 or corrupted)
                                  Return corrupted uuid.
generate_random_uuid(uuid)
mutex_unlock(&boot_id_mutex)

I prefer not requiring the fast-path to take a mutex, because this
would transform a read-mostly operation into an operation that
requires cache-line exchanges (the mutex). However, if we want the
fast-path to be mutex-free, we need to enforce order with
memory barriers: smp_rmb on the read-side, smp_wmb on the
update-side. Failure to do so leads to the race shown above,
where a corrupted boot_id can be returned.

Please let me know if there are aspects of your question I can
address better,

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Regards,
> 
> 						- Ted

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

      reply	other threads:[~2012-01-31 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30  4:40 [PATCH] char random: fix boot id uniqueness race Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-31 15:59 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-31 16:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120131162505.GA8298@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).