From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
To: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [WARN] offlining CPUs yields warning at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:120
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:24:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202012024.22322.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLZvyE=z=Y5wD-Vyp1ZbWV1-kqW8EmZkrHOcMBPZmBQ67E+Ow@mail.gmail.com>
On środa, 1 lutego 2012 o 15:23:49 Manuel Lauss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When offlining/onlining CPUs the following warning is spat out repeatedly.
> System is a 4-core+HT SandyBridge laptop. Full dmesg below.
>
> CPU 7 is now offline
> CPU 6 is now offline
> CPU 5 is now offline
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at /mnt/data/.src/linux.git/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:120
> update_process_times+0x65/0x80()
> Hardware name: Precision M6600
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 17, comm: migration/2 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1-00473-g6bc2b95 #1
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8104e5eb>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7b/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8108a000>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xd0/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8105af45>] ? update_process_times+0x65/0x80
> [<ffffffff8108a05b>] ? tick_sched_timer+0x5b/0xb0
> [<ffffffff8106dc0e>] ? __run_hrtimer.isra.33+0x4e/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8106e3e0>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xe0/0x210
> [<ffffffff810a09e0>] ? queue_stop_cpus_work+0xf0/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8101c513>] ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0xa0
> [<ffffffff818acbcb>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0x6b/0x70
> <EOI> [<ffffffff810a0a6a>] ? stop_machine_cpu_stop+0x8a/0xb0
> [<ffffffff810a06f4>] ? cpu_stopper_thread+0xc4/0x190
> [<ffffffff81073e6e>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1de/0x290
> [<ffffffff8107153f>] ? __wake_up_common+0x4f/0x80
> [<ffffffff810a0630>] ? cpu_stop_signal_done+0x30/0x30
> [<ffffffff81069ec5>] ? kthread+0x85/0x90
> [<ffffffff818ad294>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [<ffffffff81069e40>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x60/0x60
> [<ffffffff818ad290>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
> ---[ end trace 431db5dbf525be16 ]---
> CPU 4 is now offline
>
> [and so on].
>
> Please take a look.
>
It is regression? If yes, which is latest good kernel and/or can you do
bisection?
Regards
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.mrutecki.pl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 14:23 [WARN] offlining CPUs yields warning at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:120 Manuel Lauss
2012-02-01 19:24 ` Maciej Rutecki [this message]
2012-02-02 0:00 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-02 8:46 ` Manuel Lauss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201202012024.22322.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--to=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).