From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Check for quoted strings broken across lines
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:02:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202220222.GC11308@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328218456.18641.60.camel@joe2Laptop>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 01:34:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 22:29 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > But generally a good idea to warn about "easily grepable strings broken
> > into multiple lines" if possible, IMHO...
>
> Maybe count the %'s? Ignore if more than 2?
Numerous greppable strings include several formats, but you can
generally look at a message and know which non-parameterized bits to
grep for. Even in the case of strings with numerous parameters, it
often works better to grep for the whole string and replace the
parameters with '.*', and make the string incrementally less specific
until I find it. For example, from dmesg on my system:
[ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0xdb000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
Grepping for "last_pfn" or even "last_pfn = " produces a pile of
results, but grepping for 'last_pfn = .* max_arch_pfn' produces exactly
one result:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: printk(KERN_INFO "last_pfn = %#lx max_arch_pfn = %#lx\n",
That wouldn't work if the string broke across lines. So, I still think
it seems reasonable for checkpatch to encourage keeping such strings
un-split.
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 20:06 [PATCH] checkpatch: Check for quoted strings broken across lines Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 20:22 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-02 21:16 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 22:08 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-03 1:31 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 21:29 ` Jesper Juhl
2012-02-02 21:34 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-02 22:02 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-02-02 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-02 21:28 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-02 21:32 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-02 22:36 ` Josh Triplett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-03 5:27 Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 5:38 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-03 8:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-02-03 6:34 ` Josh Triplett
2012-03-20 21:06 Josh Triplett
2012-03-21 1:24 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-21 4:28 ` Josh Triplett
2012-03-21 4:35 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-21 6:05 ` Josh Triplett
2012-03-21 12:11 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120202220222.GC11308@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).