From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu,
robert.richter@amd.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:34:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120206153408.GA31237@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328538403.2482.4.camel@laptop>
+ Andreas.
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:26:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 14:25 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > In summary, two issues:
> > - Why is sched_clock_stable not set or even tested on recent AMD systems?
AFAICT, sched_clock_stable is set on Intel under the following conditions:
/*
* c->x86_power is 8000_0007 edx. Bit 8 is TSC runs at constant rate
* with P/T states and does not stop in deep C-states.
*
* It is also reliable across cores and sockets. (but not across
* cabinets - we turn it off in that case explicitly.)
*/
if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
if (!check_tsc_unstable())
sched_clock_stable = 1;
}
and yes, we can do CONSTANT_TSC and NONSTOP_TSC on the now older F10h
already, so Bulldozer can do that too, implicitly.
I don't see why sched_clock_stable shouldn't be moved to generic x86
code and set based on the two CPUID cap flags above.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 13:25 [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 14:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 17:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-02-06 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 16:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 20:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 20:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 21:19 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-07 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-07 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-07 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-07 12:08 ` [PATCH] x86, AMD: Set sched_clock_stable Borislav Petkov
2012-02-15 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-07 19:43 ` [tip:perf/core] x86/sched/perf/AMD: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2012-02-08 15:07 ` [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-08 15:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-08 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-08 15:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-18 16:50 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Fix ordering with unstable tsc Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 15:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-22 15:39 ` David Ahern
2012-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-14 19:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-14 20:07 ` David Ahern
2012-03-22 0:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-22 15:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120206153408.GA31237@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox