linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>, "San Mehat" <san@google.com>,
	"Colin Cross" <ccross@android.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:48:16 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207044816.GA31271@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=r+nReQSfdvU7+FAhMRBkZPzQ2Jg6Puw9SmvW7WijpN7A@mail.gmail.com>

This is needed so that callers would not get 'context imbalance'
warnings from the sparse tool.

As a side effect, this patch fixes the following sparse warnings:

  CHECK   mm/oom_kill.c
  mm/oom_kill.c:201:28: warning: context imbalance in 'oom_badness' -
  unexpected unlock
  include/linux/rcupdate.h:249:30: warning: context imbalance in
  'dump_tasks' - unexpected unlock
  mm/oom_kill.c:453:9: warning: context imbalance in 'oom_kill_task' -
  unexpected unlock
  CHECK   mm/memcontrol.c
  ...
  mm/memcontrol.c:1130:17: warning: context imbalance in
  'task_in_mem_cgroup' - unexpected unlock

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:32PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
[...]
> >> Unfortunately this isn't possible in this case. Unlike '({})' GCC
> >> extension, do-while statement does not evaluate to a value, i.e.
> >> 'x = do { 123; } while (0);' is illegal.
> >
> > Ah, you are right, my bad, sorry about that.
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Some __cond_lock() caller are inline functions. Is this bad?

No, that's great, actually. :-) Not obvious, but seems like
sparse understands __cond_lock in inline functions, so I'd
better use it.

Thanks,

 include/linux/oom.h |   12 +++++++++++-
 mm/oom_kill.c       |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index 552fba9..7c8946a 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
@@ -65,7 +66,16 @@ static inline void oom_killer_enable(void)
 	oom_killer_disabled = false;
 }
 
-extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
+extern struct task_struct *__find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
+
+static inline struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct task_struct *ret;
+
+	ret = __find_lock_task_mm(p);
+	(void)__cond_lock(&p->alloc_lock, ret);
+	return ret;
+}
 
 /* sysctls */
 extern int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks;
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 2958fd8..0ebb383 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk,
  * pointer.  Return p, or any of its subthreads with a valid ->mm, with
  * task_lock() held.
  */
-struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
+struct task_struct *__find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t = p;
 
-- 
1.7.7.6


  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-07  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-01  4:33 [PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-02 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-02 17:16   ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03  0:03     ` [PATCH v3] " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03 16:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-03 16:30     ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29       ` [PATCH 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:35         ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 18:59           ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 19:18             ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 21:27               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07  4:48                 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-02-07  5:17                   ` [PATCH v2 " KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:27                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-09 16:45                     ` [PATCH] sched: Turn lock_task_sighand() into a static inline Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-11 23:10                       ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-15 13:52                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 16:29       ` [PATCH 2/6] oom: Get rid of sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:33         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07  4:20           ` [PATCH v2 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07  5:38             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07  6:23               ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 18:13                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-06 16:29       ` [PATCH 3/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:36         ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 16:42           ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09  0:56             ` Greg KH
2012-02-08 15:32         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29       ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Better mm handling Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:36         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29       ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: No need for task->signal check Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:35         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:30       ` [PATCH 6/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Do not kill kernel threads Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:36         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120207044816.GA31271@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=san@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).