From: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
imunsie@au1.ibm.com, eranian@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:25:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207142521.GA5840@mgebm.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207145535.71b9f22d@kryten>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2133 bytes --]
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> A perf annotate of a kernel function written in assembly shows
> very strange percentages:
>
> : _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user_base)
>
> ...
>
> : addi r3,r3,1
> 99.67 : c00000000004d78c: addi r3,r3,1
> :
> 0.00 : 1: bf cr7*4+2,2f
> 0.07 : c00000000004d790: bne- cr7,c00000000004d7a4
> : err1; lhz r0,0(r4)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d794: lhz r0,0(r4)
> : addi r4,r4,2
> 0.00 : c00000000004d798: addi r4,r4,2
> : err1; sth r0,0(r3)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d79c: sth r0,0(r3)
> : addi r3,r3,2
> 99.60 : c00000000004d7a0: addi r3,r3,2
> :
> 0.00 : 2: bf cr7*4+1,3f
> 0.12 : c00000000004d7a4: ble- cr7,c00000000004d7b8
> : err1; lwz r0,0(r4)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7a8: lwz r0,0(r4)
> : addi r4,r4,4
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7ac: addi r4,r4,4
> : err1; stw r0,0(r3)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7b0: stw r0,0(r3)
> : addi r3,r3,4
> 99.48 : c00000000004d7b4: addi r3,r3,4
>
> ~300% in one function. Urgh.
>
> This is caused by the way we parse objdump -S output, eg:
>
> addi r3,r3,1
> c00000000004d78c: addi r3,r3,1
>
> 1: bf cr7*4+2,2f
> c00000000004d790: bne- cr7,c00000000004d7a4
>
> We assume the asm label (1:) is an address, compute a bogus offset
> into the function and then screw up the matching of samples to lines.
> I notice this also fails with c inline assembly in a similar
> manner.
>
> We already have a sanity check that the address is not beyond the end
> of the function, so add a check against the start too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Acked-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 3:55 [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation Anton Blanchard
2012-02-07 14:25 ` Eric B Munson [this message]
2012-02-07 14:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-09 10:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-09 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-09 15:50 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207142521.GA5840@mgebm.net \
--to=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox