Re: Linux 3.2.5

[Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>]

On 07.02.2012 16:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok. Can you try this?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 1cfbf22..24f049e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ static int pcie_aspm_sanity_check(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	int pos;
>  	u32 reg32;
>  
> +	if (aspm_disabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Some functions in a slot might not all be PCIe functions,
>  	 * very strange. Disable ASPM for the whole slot
> 

Works too. What is the difference (in my case)?

dmesg looks the same.

dmesg | grep -i aspm
[    0.761712] ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it
[    0.792916] ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
[    1.626739] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: Disabling ASPM  L1






Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.