From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paul@paulmenage.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu,
rjw@sisk.pl, tj@kernel.org
Cc: frank.rowand@am.sony.com, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Split up update_cpumask() so that its functionality can be reused
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:26:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207185620.7482.29594.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207185411.7482.43576.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
update_cpumask() expects the new cpuset in the form of characters (owing to
the fact that it expects cpuset updates from userspace). This might not be
appropriate if an in-kernel user wants to call it.
So, split up the function so that its functionality can be reused. That is,
introduce do_update_cpumask() and offload the core work to it.
Reported-by: Prashanth K. Nageshappa <prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 5e2323b..2be71da 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -864,13 +864,14 @@ static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct ptr_heap *heap)
cgroup_scan_tasks(&scan);
}
+
/**
- * update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks in it
+ * do_update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks
+ * in it
* @cs: the cpuset to consider
- * @buf: buffer of cpu numbers written to this cpuset
+ * @trialcs: the updated cpuset value requested
*/
-static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
- const char *buf)
+static int do_update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs)
{
struct ptr_heap heap;
int retval;
@@ -880,22 +881,9 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (cs == &top_cpuset)
return -EACCES;
- /*
- * An empty cpus_allowed is ok only if the cpuset has no tasks.
- * Since cpulist_parse() fails on an empty mask, we special case
- * that parsing. The validate_change() call ensures that cpusets
- * with tasks have cpus.
- */
- if (!*buf) {
- cpumask_clear(trialcs->cpus_allowed);
- } else {
- retval = cpulist_parse(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
- if (retval < 0)
- return retval;
-
- if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
+ if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
return -EINVAL;
- }
+
retval = validate_change(cs, trialcs);
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
@@ -925,9 +913,44 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (is_load_balanced)
async_rebuild_sched_domains();
+
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * update_cpumask - update the cpus_allowed mask of a cpuset and all tasks in it
+ * @cs: the cpuset to consider
+ * @buf: buffer of cpu numbers written to this cpuset
+ */
+static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
+ const char *buf)
+{
+ int retval;
+
+ /* top_cpuset.cpus_allowed tracks cpu_online_map; it's read-only */
+ if (cs == &top_cpuset)
+ return -EACCES;
+
+ /*
+ * An empty cpus_allowed is ok only if the cpuset has no tasks.
+ * Since cpulist_parse() fails on an empty mask, we special case
+ * that parsing. The validate_change() call ensures that cpusets
+ * with tasks have cpus.
+ */
+ if (!*buf) {
+ cpumask_clear(trialcs->cpus_allowed);
+ } else {
+ retval = cpulist_parse(buf, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
+ if (retval < 0)
+ return retval;
+
+ if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return do_update_cpumask(cs, trialcs);
+}
+
/*
* cpuset_migrate_mm
*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 18:55 [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] CPU hotplug, cpuset: Maintain a copy of the cpus_allowed mask before CPU hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-02-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Add function to introduce CPUs to cpusets during CPU online Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Differentiate the CPU online and CPU offline callbacks Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-08 3:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-08 6:33 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 8:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-10 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 21:51 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-10 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-11 2:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-11 4:26 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-17 12:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-20 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-20 12:59 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-23 9:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-24 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-27 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-27 12:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend: Don' t touch cpusets during suspend/resume tip-bot for Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-13 20:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-09 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207185620.7482.29594.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).