From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paul@paulmenage.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu,
rjw@sisk.pl, tj@kernel.org
Cc: frank.rowand@am.sony.com, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Add function to introduce CPUs to cpusets during CPU online
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:27:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207185651.7482.18642.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207185411.7482.43576.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
During a CPU online operation, at present, that CPU is added only to
top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, but not to any of the other cpusets, which
is a mistake.
So, add a function to go through all the cpusets and add this CPU to
each cpuset which contained this CPU previously. In other words, add this
CPU to those cpusets, whose cpus_allowed_before_hotplug mask contains
this CPU.
Note that this function should not modify cpus_allowed_before_hotplug.
Hence, we move that particular piece of code from do_update_cpumask()
to update_cpumask().
Reported-by: Prashanth K. Nageshappa <prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 2be71da..c56e705 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -900,7 +900,6 @@ static int do_update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs)
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
- cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed_before_hotplug, cs->cpus_allowed);
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
/*
@@ -948,7 +947,10 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
return -EINVAL;
}
- return do_update_cpumask(cs, trialcs);
+ retval = do_update_cpumask(cs, trialcs);
+
+ cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed_before_hotplug, cs->cpus_allowed);
+ return retval;
}
/*
@@ -2079,6 +2081,71 @@ static void remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
move_member_tasks_to_cpuset(cs, parent);
}
+
+/*
+ * Walk the specified cpuset subtree and add the newly onlined CPU to the
+ * cpuset, if that CPU was in this cpuset previously (IOW, if this CPU
+ * is still in the cpuset_allowed_before_hotplug mask of this cpuset).
+ *
+ * Called with cgroup_mutex held.
+ *
+ * This walk processes the tree from top to bottom, completing one layer
+ * before dropping down to the next. It always processes a node before
+ * any of its children.
+ */
+static void scan_cpusets_during_cpu_online(struct cpuset *root)
+{
+ LIST_HEAD(queue);
+ struct cpuset *cp; /* scans cpusets being updated */
+ struct cpuset *child; /* scans child cpusets of cp */
+ struct cgroup *cont;
+ struct cpuset *trialcs;
+
+ trialcs = alloc_trial_cpuset(root);
+ if (!trialcs)
+ return;
+
+ list_add_tail((struct list_head *)&root->stack_list, &queue);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&queue)) {
+ cp = list_first_entry(&queue, struct cpuset, stack_list);
+ list_del(queue.next);
+ list_for_each_entry(cont, &cp->css.cgroup->children, sibling) {
+ child = cgroup_cs(cont);
+ list_add_tail(&child->stack_list, &queue);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Continue past cpusets which didn't have this CPU previously
+ * (Note that when this CPU went offline, it had been removed
+ * from all cpusets.)
+ */
+ if (cpumask_equal(cp->cpus_allowed,
+ cp->cpus_allowed_before_hotplug))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Add newly onlined CPUs to this cpuset if they were part of
+ * this cpuset previously.
+ */
+ cpumask_and(trialcs->cpus_allowed,
+ cp->cpus_allowed_before_hotplug,
+ cpu_active_mask);
+
+ /* Update the cpuset */
+ do_update_cpumask(cp, trialcs);
+
+ /*
+ * Do NOT update cpus_allowed_before_hotplug here. We want it
+ * to reflect the value of cpus_allowed as seen *before* the
+ * hotplug event.
+ */
+ }
+
+ free_trial_cpuset(trialcs);
+}
+
+
/*
* Walk the specified cpuset subtree and look for empty cpusets.
* The tasks of such cpuset must be moved to a parent cpuset.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 18:55 [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] CPU hotplug, cpuset: Maintain a copy of the cpus_allowed mask before CPU hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Split up update_cpumask() so that its functionality can be reused Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-02-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Differentiate the CPU online and CPU offline callbacks Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-08 3:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-08 6:33 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 8:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-10 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 21:51 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-10 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-11 2:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-11 4:26 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-17 12:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-20 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-20 12:59 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-23 9:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-24 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-27 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-27 12:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend: Don' t touch cpusets during suspend/resume tip-bot for Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-13 20:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-09 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207185651.7482.18642.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).