From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757198Ab2BGXRd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:17:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39511 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753992Ab2BGXRc (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:17:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:19:24 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal To: Don Zickus Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , x86@kernel.org, LKML , kexec-list Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path Message-ID: <20120207221924.GH6346@redhat.com> References: <1328206323-25580-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <20120207215741.GD5650@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120207215741.GD5650@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:24:46PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Eric, brought up a point that because the boot code was restructured we may > > > not need to disable the io apic any more in the crash path. The original > > > concern that led to the development of disable_IO_APIC, was that the TSC > > > calibration on boot up relied on the PIT timer for reference. Access > > > to the PIT required 8259 interrupts to be working. This wouldn't work > > > if the ioapic needed to be configured. So on panic path, the ioapic was > > > reconfigured to use virtual wire mode to allow the 8259 to passthrough. > > > > A small clarification originally it was the jiffies calibration that > > would fail if we could cause the PIT to generate interrupts through the > > 8259. The boot would then hang at calibrating jiffies. > > Ok. Thanks! So now what has changed? Do we setup LAPIC and IOAPIC early enough to receive PIT interrupts in regular mode (non-virtual wire mode) or something else? Thanks Vivek