From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] blackfin: Fix possible race on task->mm
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:20:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120208162013.GC17177@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207065054.GF1496@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On 02/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> Even when in atomic context, grabbing irqsave variant of tasklist lock
> is not enough to protect task->mm from disappearing on SMP machines.
> Instead, we have to grab the task lock.
Yes, but afaics there is no reason for write_lock_irqsave(tasklist).
read_lock() should be enough.
I know nothing about arch/blackfin/ but in fact this looks simply wrong.
For example. sysrq_showregs_othercpus() does smp_call_function(showacpu)
and showacpu() show_stack()->decode_address(). Now suppose that IPI
interrupts the task holding read_lock(tasklist).
Mike?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-08 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 6:48 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 6:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] sysrq: Fix possible race with exiting task Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09 1:47 ` David Rientjes
2012-02-07 6:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] sysrq: Properly check for kernel threads Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09 1:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-02-07 6:50 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm: Fix possible race on task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-09 15:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09 15:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-10 20:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-09 1:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-02-07 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/mm: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 6:50 ` [PATCH 5/8] sh: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 6:50 ` [PATCH 6/8] blackfin: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-02-07 6:51 ` [PATCH 7/8] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 6:51 ` [PATCH 8/8] um: Fix possible race on task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 15:59 ` [PATCH 0/8] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and task->mm Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120208162013.GC17177@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).