linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seiji.aguchi@hds.com, dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmsg_dump: Don't run on non-error paths by default
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:44:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120208164409.GB19323@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120208163720.GB3322@srcf.ucam.org>

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:37:20PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:30:07AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (reason > KMSG_DUMP_PANIC && !always_kmsg_dump)
> > > +		return;
> > 
> > Did you mean reason > KMSG_DUMP_OOPS to enable oops logging by default?
> 
> Bah. Yes, I think my test system was set to panic on oops so I didn't 
> catch that.
> 
> > Given the fact that not everybody likes kmsg_dump() and it is not known
> > how stable it with various backends, will it make sense to keep it disabled
> > by default and provide a knob to enable it (instead of always_kmsg_dump).
> 
> I think logging panics and oopses by default is a useful feature. It may 
> be desirable to have a mechanism to disable it if some other way of 
> handling that (serial console, kdump) is available.

Ok, keeping it enabled by default for panic and oops might be better.

Thinking more about it. This problem sounds similar to different kernel log
levels where we enable desired level of logging. May be instead of having
a boolean knob, we can have multivalue knob.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-08 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-08 16:14 [PATCH] kmsg_dump: Don't run on non-error paths by default Matthew Garrett
2012-02-08 16:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-08 16:37   ` Matthew Garrett
2012-02-08 16:44     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-02-08 20:24 ` Seiji Aguchi
     [not found] ` <32727E9A83EE9A42A1F0906295A3A77B2E598C0A2F@USINDEVS01.corp.hds.com>
2012-02-08 20:26   ` Seiji Aguchi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-10 15:11 Matthew Garrett
2012-02-10 15:36 ` Jack Stone
2012-02-10 15:44   ` Matthew Garrett
2012-02-10 15:44 ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120208164409.GB19323@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).