From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>, "San Mehat" <san@google.com>,
"Colin Cross" <ccross@android.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Turn lock_task_sighand() into a static inline
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:45:19 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209164519.GA10266@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120208152750.GA15782@redhat.com>
It appears that sparse tool understands static inline functions for
context balance checking, so let's turn the macros into an inline func.
This makes the code a little bit more robust.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:27:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:32PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >
> > > Some __cond_lock() caller are inline functions. Is this bad?
> >
> > No, that's great, actually. :-) Not obvious, but seems like
> > sparse understands __cond_lock in inline functions, so I'd
> > better use it.
>
> Hmm, great...
>
> may be you can update lock_task_sighand() too ? (in a separate
> patch of course).
Sure thing. Here it goes...
include/linux/sched.h | 15 +++++++++------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e82f721..22ae10e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2394,12 +2394,15 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
extern struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags);
-#define lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags) \
-({ struct sighand_struct *__ss; \
- __cond_lock(&(tsk)->sighand->siglock, \
- (__ss = __lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags))); \
- __ss; \
-}) \
+static inline struct sighand_struct *lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ struct sighand_struct *ret;
+
+ ret = __lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags);
+ (void)__cond_lock(&tsk->sighand->siglock, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
static inline void unlock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags)
--
1.7.8.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 4:33 [PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-02 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-02 17:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03 0:03 ` [PATCH v3] " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-03 16:30 ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:35 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 18:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 19:18 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 21:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 5:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-09 16:45 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-02-11 23:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Turn lock_task_sighand() into a static inline tip-bot for Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-15 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] oom: Get rid of sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 4:20 ` [PATCH v2 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 5:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 6:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 18:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:36 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 16:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09 0:56 ` Greg KH
2012-02-08 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Better mm handling Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: No need for task->signal check Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Do not kill kernel threads Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120209164519.GA10266@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=san@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).