From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Evans <scarybeasts@gmail.com>,
Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: the killed tracee should not enter the syscall
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:32:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210173259.GG8908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210173237.GF8908@redhat.com>
Another old/known problem. If the tracee is killed after it reports
syscall_entry, it starts the syscall and debugger can't control this.
This confuses the users and this creates the security problems for
ptrace jailers.
Change tracehook_report_syscall_entry() to return non-zero if killed,
this instructs syscall_trace_enter() to abort the syscall.
Reported-by: Chris Evans <scarybeasts@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/tracehook.h | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h
index a71a292..51bd91d 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracehook.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@ struct linux_binprm;
/*
* ptrace report for syscall entry and exit looks identical.
*/
-static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline int ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ptrace = current->ptrace;
if (!(ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
- return;
+ return 0;
ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP | ((ptrace & PT_TRACESYSGOOD) ? 0x80 : 0));
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
send_sig(current->exit_code, current, 1);
current->exit_code = 0;
}
+
+ return fatal_signal_pending(current);
}
/**
@@ -96,8 +98,7 @@ static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
static inline __must_check int tracehook_report_syscall_entry(
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
- return 0;
+ return ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
}
/**
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 14:43 [PATCH 0/5] ptrace tweaks Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: don't modify flags on PTRACE_SETOPTIONS failure Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] ptrace: simplify PTRACE_foo constants and PTRACE_SETOPTIONS code Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] ptrace: make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] ptrace: renumber PTRACE_EVENT_STOP so that future new options and events can match Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: remove PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL bit Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:46 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:49 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 19:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 17:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] ptrace: renumber PTRACE_EVENT_STOP so that future new options and events can match Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] ptrace: make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 16:34 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 " Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 17:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] ptrace: simplify PTRACE_foo constants and PTRACE_SETOPTIONS code Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: don't modify flags on PTRACE_SETOPTIONS failure Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] more tweaks (Was: ptrace tweaks) Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-02-10 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: don't send SIGTRAP on exec if SEIZED Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] more tweaks (Was: ptrace tweaks) Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210173259.GG8908@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).