From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in disk event polling
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210204652.GJ19392@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1202101519020.1281-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
(cc'ing Rafael)
Hello, Alan.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:31:20PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Don't ask me why this hasn't shown up earlier... There's a big fat bug
> in the implementation of disk event polling.
>
> The polling is done using the system_nrt_wq work queue, which isn't
> freezable. As a result, polling continues while the system is
> preparing for suspend or hibernation.
>
> Obviously I/O to suspended devices doesn't work well. Somewhat less
> obviously, error recovery for the failed I/O attempts can interfere
> with normal system resume.
Hmmm.... I see. Yeah, that can be a problem.
> You can see this for yourself easily enough by suspending or
> hibernating while a USB flash drive is plugged in. You don't even need
> to go through the full suspend procedure; the first two stages are
> enough (echo devices >/sys/power/pm_test). Check the system log
> afterward; most likely you'll find the flash drive got errors and had
> to be unregistered and re-enumerated.
Do you happen to have log of such failure? Polilng failure itself
shouldn't lead to such failure mode.
> I have verified that changing all occurrences of system_nrt_wq in
> block/genhd.c to system_freezable_wq fixes the bug. However this may
> not be the way you want to solve it; you may prefer to have a freezable
> non-reentrant work queue.
Please feel free to send out a patch to fix the issue. :)
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 20:31 Bug in disk event polling Alan Stern
2012-02-10 20:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-02-10 21:03 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-10 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 21:44 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-11 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-12 17:48 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-12 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-12 22:02 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-13 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210204652.GJ19392@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).