* 2.6.32.55+ printk_ratelimit()
@ 2012-02-13 20:58 Sven-Haegar Koch
2012-02-13 21:44 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sven-Haegar Koch @ 2012-02-13 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Linux-Kernel-Mailinglist
hello,
catching up with the stable kernel 2.6.32 I saw that 2.6.32.55 included
8a64f33 "kernel.h: add printk_ratelimited and pr_<level>_rl"
Could it be that 2.6.32.x now also should get upstream
d8521fcc5e0ad3e79bbc4231bb20a6cdc2b50164 "printk_ratelimited(): fix
uninitialized spinlock" ?
c'ya
sven-haegar
--
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
- Ben F.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.32.55+ printk_ratelimit()
2012-02-13 20:58 2.6.32.55+ printk_ratelimit() Sven-Haegar Koch
@ 2012-02-13 21:44 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2012-02-13 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven-Haegar Koch; +Cc: stable, Linux-Kernel-Mailinglist
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:58:08PM +0100, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> hello,
>
> catching up with the stable kernel 2.6.32 I saw that 2.6.32.55 included
> 8a64f33 "kernel.h: add printk_ratelimited and pr_<level>_rl"
>
> Could it be that 2.6.32.x now also should get upstream
> d8521fcc5e0ad3e79bbc4231bb20a6cdc2b50164 "printk_ratelimited(): fix
> uninitialized spinlock" ?
Yes, I've now queued that one up, as well as another printk_ratelimit
fix that is needed.
thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-13 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-13 20:58 2.6.32.55+ printk_ratelimit() Sven-Haegar Koch
2012-02-13 21:44 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox