From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: [PATCH] char random: fix boot id uniqueness race (v2)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:10:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120215041014.GA15846@Krystal> (raw)
The proc file /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id can be read concurrently
by user-space processes. If two (or more) user-space processes
concurrently read boot_id when sysctl_bootid is not yet assigned, a race
can occur making boot_id differ between the reads. Because the whole
point of the boot id is to be unique across a kernel execution, fix this
by protecting this operation with a mutex, and introduce a
boot_id_generated flag, along with appropriate memory barriers, to let
the fast-path know if the boot ID has been generated without having to
hold the mutex.
I propose this approach rather than setting it up within an initcall(),
because letting execution randomness add to entropy before populating
the boot id seems to be a wanted property. Also, populating it lazily
rather than at boot time only makes the performance hit be taken when
boot_id is being read.
Q: Why are these memory barriers required ? Aren't the mutexes already
dealing with ordering ?
The need for memory barriers is a consequence of letting the fast-path
run without holding this mutex.
Here is the race dealt with by the smp_rmb()/smp_wmb(). I'm showing the
result of reversed write order here:
CPU A CPU B
Load boot_id_generated
(test -> false)
mutex_lock(&boot_id_mutex)
(implied memory barrier
with acquire semantic)
Load boot_id_generated again
(test -> false)
boot_id_generated = 1
(both the compiler and
CPU are free to reorder
the boot_id_generated
store before uuid stores)
Load boot_id_generated
(test -> true)
Load uuid content
(races with generate_random_uuid:
result either 0 or corrupted)
Return corrupted uuid.
generate_random_uuid(uuid)
mutex_unlock(&boot_id_mutex)
I prefer not requiring the fast-path to take a mutex, because this
would transform a read-mostly operation into an operation that
requires cache-line exchanges (the mutex). However, if we want the
fast-path to be mutex-free, we need to enforce order with
memory barriers: smp_rmb on the read-side, smp_wmb on the
update-side. Failure to do so leads to the race shown above, where
a corrupted boot_id can be returned.
* Changelog since v1:
- boot_id_mutex is now declared within the proc_do_uuid scope.
- added explanation for memory barriers.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
---
drivers/char/random.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/drivers/char/random.c
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -1244,16 +1244,30 @@ static char sysctl_bootid[16];
static int proc_do_uuid(ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
+ static int boot_id_generated;
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(boot_id_mutex);
ctl_table fake_table;
unsigned char buf[64], tmp_uuid[16], *uuid;
uuid = table->data;
if (!uuid) {
uuid = tmp_uuid;
- uuid[8] = 0;
- }
- if (uuid[8] == 0)
generate_random_uuid(uuid);
+ } else {
+ if (unlikely(!ACCESS_ONCE(boot_id_generated))) {
+ mutex_lock(&boot_id_mutex);
+ if (!boot_id_generated) {
+ generate_random_uuid(uuid);
+ /* Store uuid before boot_id_generated. */
+ smp_wmb();
+ boot_id_generated = 1;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&boot_id_mutex);
+ } else {
+ /* Load boot_id_generated before uuid */
+ smp_rmb();
+ }
+ }
sprintf(buf, "%pU", uuid);
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-15 4:10 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2012-02-15 5:48 ` [PATCH] char random: fix boot id uniqueness race (v2) Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-02-15 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120215041014.GA15846@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox