From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759297Ab2BOOyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:54:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10117 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753914Ab2BOOym (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:54:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:54:29 -0500 From: Don Zickus To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, LKML , tony.luck@intel.com, seiji.aguchi@hds.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mjg@redhat.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, reschedule: check to see if system is shutting down Message-ID: <20120215145429.GE9751@redhat.com> References: <1329164860-668-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1329164860-668-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1329305197.2293.50.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1329305197.2293.50.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:26:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Right, so this fixes this one particular case, I imagine there's tons of > places that could go splat due to this (but don't quite yet for some > reason). > > We can't go around annotating everything, nor would we want to simply > shut up all warnings for fear of missing an actual error. > > Why can't the normal shut-down path use a less crazy approach to going > down? Well maybe it can, it's been like that way for over three years now. I'm surprised no one ran into issues before now. The only thing I can think that would work is stop_machine(). Pass in a halt function and a cpumask of everyone but smp_processor_id(). That would solve the problem, no? Cheers, Don