From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hugetlbfs lockdep spew revisited.
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:38:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217003848.GB20071@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120217001634.GH23550@zod.bos.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4619 bytes --]
On 2012-02-16 19:16:34, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:08:57PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Remember this ? https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/15/272
> > Josh took a stab at fixing it in e096d0c7e2e4e5893792db865dd065ac73cf1f00,
> > but it seems to still be there.
>
> I think Tyler Hicks actually noticed this a while ago, but his patch has
> been waiting on comment from Al and Christoph:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/58795/focus=59565
>
> I've been hesitant to comment because I obviously screwed up once
> already. We could try this patch in Fedora for a while if Al and
> company don't speak up soon.
I'm pretty confident that my patch that Josh linked to would "fix" the
lockdep warning below. According to the backtrace, it is barking about a
directory inode and a regular inode having a circular locking
dependency, so deadlock is not possible in this case.
akpm picked up my patch in the mm tree, but it still hasn't made it into
mainline.
Tyler
>
> josh
>
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > ======================================================
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 3.3.0-rc3+ #2 Not tainted
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > trinity/30663 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81298169>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81182d97>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d7/0x230
> >
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> >
> > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> >
> > -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
> > [<ffffffff810d073d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x220
> > [<ffffffff811789c0>] might_fault+0x80/0xb0
> > [<ffffffff811d2997>] filldir+0x77/0xe0
> > [<ffffffff811e61ae>] dcache_readdir+0x5e/0x220
> > [<ffffffff811d2c68>] vfs_readdir+0xb8/0xf0
> > [<ffffffff811d2d99>] sys_getdents+0x89/0x100
> > [<ffffffff816a5b69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
> > -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18){+.+...}:
> > [<ffffffff810d0008>] __lock_acquire+0x1bf8/0x1c20
> > [<ffffffff810d073d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x220
> > [<ffffffff8169a5b9>] __mutex_lock_common+0x59/0x500
> > [<ffffffff8169ab94>] mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
> > [<ffffffff81298169>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> > [<ffffffff811826a9>] mmap_region+0x369/0x4f0
> > [<ffffffff81182b9f>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x36f/0x390
> > [<ffffffff81182db7>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1f7/0x230
> > [<ffffffff8101eda2>] sys_mmap+0x22/0x30
> > [<ffffffff816a5b69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> >
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > ---- ----
> > lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18);
> > lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#18);
> >
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > 1 lock held by trinity/30663:
> > #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81182d97>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d7/0x230
> >
> > stack backtrace:
> > Pid: 30663, comm: trinity Not tainted 3.3.0-rc3+ #2
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff816924d7>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c
> > [<ffffffff810d0008>] __lock_acquire+0x1bf8/0x1c20
> > [<ffffffff816a1c2d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff811a40cc>] ? deactivate_slab+0x54c/0x5f0
> > [<ffffffff810d073d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x220
> > [<ffffffff81298169>] ? hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> > [<ffffffff810d12fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1a0
> > [<ffffffff8169a5b9>] __mutex_lock_common+0x59/0x500
> > [<ffffffff81298169>] ? hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> > [<ffffffff811825e5>] ? mmap_region+0x2a5/0x4f0
> > [<ffffffff81298169>] ? hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> > [<ffffffff8169ab94>] mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
> > [<ffffffff81298169>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x89/0x140
> > [<ffffffff811826a9>] mmap_region+0x369/0x4f0
> > [<ffffffff812c1e9a>] ? file_map_prot_check+0xaa/0xe0
> > [<ffffffff81182b9f>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x36f/0x390
> > [<ffffffff81182d97>] ? sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d7/0x230
> > [<ffffffff81182db7>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1f7/0x230
> > [<ffffffff810d12fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1a0
> > [<ffffffff8101eda2>] sys_mmap+0x22/0x30
> > [<ffffffff816a5b69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-17 0:08 hugetlbfs lockdep spew revisited Dave Jones
2012-02-17 0:16 ` Josh Boyer
2012-02-17 0:34 ` Al Viro
2012-02-17 0:38 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2012-02-17 0:49 ` Al Viro
2012-02-17 3:42 ` Tyler Hicks
2012-02-21 18:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-02-17 6:47 ` J. R. Okajima
2012-02-17 17:48 ` udf deadlock (was Re: hugetlbfs lockdep spew revisited.) Al Viro
2012-02-20 16:01 ` Jan Kara
2012-02-18 10:55 ` hugetlbfs lockdep spew revisited Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-02-17 0:27 ` Al Viro
2012-02-23 9:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120217003848.GB20071@boyd \
--to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).