public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Macht <holger@homac.de>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: dock_link_device is oopsy
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:26:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120218132610.GA15265@homac.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd=RBDRZSizawvRYqr7=U75Su5TLvMfgdagRA49wzJr40DqSg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sa 18. Feb - 21:05:18, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Holger Macht <holger@homac.de> wrote:
> > So how about that?
> >
> > acpi: Bail out when linking devices and there are no dock stations
> >
> > If dock_station_count is zero, we allocate zero memory and don't check
> > this at future references. So bail out if there are actually no dock
> > stations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <holger@homac.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/dock.c |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > index b5e4142..0b3072c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > @@ -281,11 +281,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_dock_device);
> >  */
> >  struct device **dock_link_device(acpi_handle handle)
> >  {
> > -       struct device *dev = acpi_get_physical_device(handle);
> > +       struct device *dev;
> >        struct dock_station *dock_station;
> >        int ret, dock = 0;
> >        struct device **devices;
> >
> > +       if (!dock_station_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       dev = acpi_get_physical_device(handle);
> >        devices = kmalloc(dock_station_count * sizeof(struct device *),
> >                          GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > @@ -320,12 +324,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dock_link_device);
> >  */
> >  struct device **dock_unlink_device(acpi_handle handle)
> >  {
> > -       struct device *dev = acpi_get_physical_device(handle);
> > +       struct device *dev;
> >        struct dock_station *dock_station;
> >        int dock = 0;
> > -       struct device **devices =
> > -               kmalloc(dock_station_count * sizeof(struct device *),
> > -                       GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       struct device **devices;
> > +
> > +       if (!dock_station_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       dev = acpi_get_physical_device(handle);
> > +       devices = kmalloc(dock_station_count * sizeof(struct device *),
> > +                         GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> 
> If bail out in this way, another patch looks needed to fix up
> mem leakage :-(

Sorry if I'm a little slow...but where is the leakage? The function
doesn't allocate anything before bailing out in the dock_station_count
check. And the rerun value should be freed by the caller. Please point
me in the right direction.

Thanks,
 Holger

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-18 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-17 21:46 linux-next: dock_link_device is oopsy Hugh Dickins
2012-02-17 22:29 ` Holger Macht
2012-02-17 22:42   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-17 23:01     ` Holger Macht
2012-02-17 23:49       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-18 11:14         ` Holger Macht
2012-02-18 13:05           ` Hillf Danton
2012-02-18 13:26             ` Holger Macht [this message]
2012-02-18 13:37               ` Hillf Danton
2012-02-18 14:04                 ` Holger Macht
2012-02-18 14:35                   ` Hillf Danton
2012-02-18 18:46                   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-18 19:57                     ` Holger Macht
2012-02-18 21:03                       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-18 21:50                         ` Holger Macht
2012-02-21 22:24                       ` Jeff Garzik
2012-02-21 22:30                         ` Holger Macht
2012-02-18  7:52       ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120218132610.GA15265@homac.suse.de \
    --to=holger@homac.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox