linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 uv: lower UV rtc clocksource rating
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:51:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120219125132.GC25900@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120217141641.GA28063@sgi.com>

* Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:02:42PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Lower the rating of the UV rtc clocksource to just below that of the tsc.
> > 
> > This changelog is deficient for obvious reasons, mind updating 
> > it?
> >
> OK.  Is this sufficient?
> 
> 
> Lower the rating of the UV rtc clocksource to just below that of the tsc.
> 
> Reading the tsc clocksource has lower latency than reading the rtc, so favor
> it in situations where it is synchronized and stable.  When the tsc is
> unsynchronized, the rtc needs to be the chosen clocksource.

Yeah, perfect, thanks.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-19 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-16 20:10 [PATCH] x86 uv: lower UV rtc clocksource rating Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-17 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-17 14:16   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-19 12:51     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-02-20 11:46     ` [tip:x86/uv] x86/UV: Lower " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120219125132.GC25900@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).