linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
	Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:17:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com> (raw)


It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD multi-node
processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we have 2 NUMA
nodes on one socket. And thus there are cores having different
numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id. For example on such a system
we now get

[    0.228109] Booting Node   0, Processors  #1
[    0.232337] smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 83000
[    0.252088]  #2
[    0.253746] smpboot cpu 2: start_ip = 83000
[    0.272086]  #3
[    0.276018] smpboot cpu 3: start_ip = 83000
[    0.296088]  #4
[    0.297745] smpboot cpu 4: start_ip = 83000
[    0.316088]  #5
[    0.320021] smpboot cpu 5: start_ip = 83000
[    0.340113]  Ok.
[    0.342324] Booting Node   1, Processors  #6
[    0.344344] smpboot cpu 6: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[    0.372110]  #7
[    0.373771] smpboot cpu 7: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[    0.396104]  #8
[    0.397764] smpboot cpu 8: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[    0.420109]  #9
[    0.421773] smpboot cpu 9: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[    0.444113]  #10
[    0.445865] smpboot cpu 10: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[    0.468111]  #11
[    0.472030] smpboot cpu 11: start_ip = 83000
[    0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0

These NUMA core numbering error messages are plain wrong.

The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with commit
64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda (x86: Add x86_init platform
override to fix up NUMA core numbering) and should be removed.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

BTW, I wonder why the fixup code isn't called from the Intel path.  At
least the mentioned patch suggests that something more generic was
introduced here.

And I am curious why there is this specific condition to decide
whether a call to x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id is required.


Regards,
Andreas


diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index d43cad7..2ef7685 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1163,7 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
  */
 void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
 {
-	pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.8.4




             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-20 17:17 Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2012-02-21 10:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 11:05   ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-21 11:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 12:56       ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-22 13:47     ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-23 10:23       ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-24 15:31         ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-27 12:07           ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-28 15:27             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-28 16:42           ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-03-02 11:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-02 11:51               ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-02 16:06                 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-04 12:38                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 17:31                     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 18:53                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com \
    --to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sp@numascale.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).