From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:17:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD multi-node
processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we have 2 NUMA
nodes on one socket. And thus there are cores having different
numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id. For example on such a system
we now get
[ 0.228109] Booting Node 0, Processors #1
[ 0.232337] smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.252088] #2
[ 0.253746] smpboot cpu 2: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.272086] #3
[ 0.276018] smpboot cpu 3: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.296088] #4
[ 0.297745] smpboot cpu 4: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.316088] #5
[ 0.320021] smpboot cpu 5: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.340113] Ok.
[ 0.342324] Booting Node 1, Processors #6
[ 0.344344] smpboot cpu 6: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.372110] #7
[ 0.373771] smpboot cpu 7: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.396104] #8
[ 0.397764] smpboot cpu 8: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.420109] #9
[ 0.421773] smpboot cpu 9: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.444113] #10
[ 0.445865] smpboot cpu 10: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.468111] #11
[ 0.472030] smpboot cpu 11: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
These NUMA core numbering error messages are plain wrong.
The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with commit
64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda (x86: Add x86_init platform
override to fix up NUMA core numbering) and should be removed.
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
BTW, I wonder why the fixup code isn't called from the Intel path. At
least the mentioned patch suggests that something more generic was
introduced here.
And I am curious why there is this specific condition to decide
whether a call to x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id is required.
Regards,
Andreas
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index d43cad7..2ef7685 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1163,7 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
*/
void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
- pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
}
/*
--
1.7.8.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 17:17 Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2012-02-21 10:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 11:05 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-21 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 12:56 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-22 13:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-23 10:23 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-24 15:31 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-27 12:07 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-28 15:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-28 16:42 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-03-02 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-02 11:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-02 16:06 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-04 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 18:53 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).