* [PATCH 1/5] genirq: Fix incorrect check for forced IRQ thread handler
@ 2012-02-20 17:30 Alexander Gordeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2012-02-20 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Oleg Nesterov, linux-kernel
We do not want a bitwise AND between boolean operands
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index a9a9dbe..c0730ad 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
struct irqaction *action);
int wake;
- if (force_irqthreads & test_bit(IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD,
+ if (force_irqthreads && test_bit(IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD,
&action->thread_flags))
handler_fn = irq_forced_thread_fn;
else
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-20 17:30 [PATCH 1/5] genirq: Fix incorrect check for forced IRQ thread handler Alexander Gordeev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).