From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753667Ab2BTUpo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:45:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:41207 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753312Ab2BTUpn (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:45:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:45:09 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Miller Cc: herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [21/28] crypto: sha512 - Avoid stack bloat on i386 Message-ID: <20120220204509.GA16013@kroah.com> References: <20120217021718.GA21573@kroah.com> <20120217022806.GA4980@gondor.apana.org.au> <20120217023742.GA21909@kroah.com> <20120216.215431.1415875817745523201.davem@davemloft.net> <20120217033054.GA22823@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120217033054.GA22823@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:30:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:54:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Greg KH > > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:37:42 -0800 > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:28:06PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:17:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:52:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > >> > > From: Greg KH > > >> > > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:55:55 -0800 > > >> > > > > >> > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > >> > > > > >> > > This causes a stack usage regression on sparc that Herbert > > >> > > is in the middle of merging a fix for into Linus's tree. > > >> > > > >> > Ick. Any idea when that will hit Linus's tree? If it's before next > > >> > Monday, we are good, and I can queue it up here, if not, then I'll drop > > >> > this and have to add it back later. > > >> > > >> I've pushed it though it hasn't been pulled yet: > > >> > > >> The commit ID is f2ea0f5f04c97b48c88edccba52b0682fbe45087. > > > > > > Thanks, I'll watch out for it. > > > > Greg, keep in mind that this stuff is in your 3.0-stable series too. > > I just checked, and I also have this in the 2.6.32-stable tree, which I > haven't sent out for review, but will next week. > > Thanks for pointing it out. Ok, that's now in Linus's tree, so I've queued it up for the 3.0 and 3.2 releases in a few hours. greg k-h