From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755901Ab2BVLa0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:30:26 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36528 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065Ab2BVLaZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:30:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:29:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov , "Luck, Tony" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, castet.matthieu@free.fr, tglx@linutronix.de, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, hpa@linux.intel.com, rjw@sisk.pl, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove some noise from boot log when starting cpus Message-ID: <20120222112954.GA12859@elte.hu> References: <4E53FBBB.7030008@zytor.com> <4e540cf271396b4c4@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com> <20120220160804.GC26703@x1.osrc.amd.com> <20120222103348.GE30339@elte.hu> <20120222105732.GA5176@x1.osrc.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120222105732.GA5176@x1.osrc.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 01:26:26PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > Printing the "start_ip" for every secondary cpu is very noisy on a large > > > > system - and doesn't add any value. Drop this message. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck > > > > > > This one is still out-of-tree, can we pick it up pls? > > > > Seems rather old - please resubmit and make sure it still works > > as expected, etc. > > Yeah, I'll leave that to Tony. I could then verify it works although it > is trivial enough and could go in even now. fine with me - please resend nevertheless. Thanks, Ingo