From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Cc: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:44:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120223154438.GA4354@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120222173505.GD7147@redhat.com>
On 02/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> However this needs more locking. ep_remove_wait_queue() should take
> ep->lock first to avoid the race and pin pwq->whead, then it needs
> pwq->whead->lock for __remove_wait_queue().
>
> This can obviously AB-BA deadlock with wake_up()->ep_poll_callback(),
> so ep_remove_wait_queue() does the nasty lock + trylock-or-retry dance.
Or we can rely on the fact that sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
and assume that ->whead is always rcu-protected if it can go away.
In this case we don't need 3/4 (although it makes sense to add the
fat comment), and 4/4 can be simplified, see below.
ep_pwq_from_wait() is not really needed, it has a single caller.
Just I tried to follow the coding style.
I'd prefer the explicit locking, but I don't really mind.
Oleg.
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -320,6 +320,11 @@ static inline int ep_is_linked(struct list_head *p)
return !list_empty(p);
}
+static inline struct eppoll_entry *ep_pwq_from_wait(wait_queue_t *p)
+{
+ return container_of(p, struct eppoll_entry, wait);
+}
+
/* Get the "struct epitem" from a wait queue pointer */
static inline struct epitem *ep_item_from_wait(wait_queue_t *p)
{
@@ -467,6 +472,17 @@ static void ep_poll_safewake(wait_queue_head_t *wq)
put_cpu();
}
+static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
+{
+ wait_queue_head_t *whead;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ whead = rcu_dereference(pwq->whead);
+ if (whead)
+ remove_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
/*
* This function unregisters poll callbacks from the associated file
* descriptor. Must be called with "mtx" held (or "epmutex" if called from
@@ -481,7 +497,7 @@ static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
pwq = list_first_entry(lsthead, struct eppoll_entry, llink);
list_del(&pwq->llink);
- remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, &pwq->wait);
+ ep_remove_wait_queue(pwq);
kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
}
}
@@ -845,8 +861,11 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
/* the caller holds eppoll_entry->whead->lock */
- if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE)
+ if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
+ /* can't use __remove_wait_queue(), we need list_del_init() */
list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
+ ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead = NULL;
+ }
/*
* If the event mask does not contain any poll(2) event, we consider the
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120222173326.GA7139@redhat.com>
2012-02-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] signalfd: introduce signalfd_cleanup() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] epoll: introduce POLLFREE for ep_poll_callback() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] signalfd: signalfd_cleanup() can race with remove_wait_queue() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-23 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-02-23 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 19:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] signalfd/epoll fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-29 19:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-02-29 20:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-29 20:16 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-03-01 19:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] signalfd/epoll fixes Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-25 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-25 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120223154438.GA4354@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=eugeneteo@kernel.sg \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).