From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757569Ab2BXAIB (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:08:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:48593 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757529Ab2BXAGI (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:06:08 -0500 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 10.68.135.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20120224000220.759957746@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.51-15.1 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:02:25 -0800 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: [ 05/10] i387: move TS_USEDFPU clearing out of __save_init_fpu and into callers In-Reply-To: <20120224000510.GA1005@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Linus Torvalds commit b6c66418dcad0fcf83cd1d0a39482db37bf4fc41 upstream. Touching TS_USEDFPU without touching CR0.TS is confusing, so don't do it. By moving it into the callers, we always do the TS_USEDFPU next to the CR0.TS accesses in the source code, and it's much easier to see how the two go hand in hand. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static inline void fpu_save_init(struct static inline void __save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk) { fpu_save_init(&tsk->thread.fpu); - task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU; } static inline int fpu_fxrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu) @@ -290,6 +289,7 @@ static inline void __unlazy_fpu(struct t { if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) { __save_init_fpu(tsk); + task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU; stts(); } else tsk->fpu_counter = 0; @@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable()); preempt_disable(); - if (me->status & TS_USEDFPU) + if (me->status & TS_USEDFPU) { __save_init_fpu(me->task); - else + me->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU; + /* We do 'stts()' in kernel_fpu_end() */ + } else clts(); } @@ -449,6 +451,7 @@ static inline void save_init_fpu(struct WARN_ON_ONCE(!(task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU)); preempt_disable(); __save_init_fpu(tsk); + task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU; stts(); preempt_enable(); }