linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: ke.yu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] processor passthru - upload _Cx and _Pxx data to hypervisor (v5).
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:08:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224150807.GA17879@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F47733E020000780007497D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:23:42AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.02.12 at 23:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > This module (processor-passthru)  collects the information that the cpufreq
> > drivers and the ACPI processor code save in the 'struct acpi_processor' and
> > then uploads it to the hypervisor.
> 
> Thus looks conceptually wrong to me - there shouldn't be a need for a
> CPUFreq driver to be loaded in Dom0 (or your module should masquerade
> as the one and only suitable one).

I piggyback on the generic cpufreq drivers to collect the information they
have evaluated.

I can make the driver a cpufreq one but there does not seem to be a way
from the kernel to force a specific driver to say "use me". I could write
it naturally, but not sure what the usage case is except for the driver
I wrote. But perhaps there is also for the cpufreq powernow-k8 and acpi-processor
so that they can function without the need for strict compile order
(where powernow-k8 MUST be loaded before acpi-processor).

> 
> > On the hypervisor side, it requires this patch on AMD:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # Parent aea8cfac8cf1afe397f2e1d422a852008d8a83fe
> > traps: AMD PM RDMSRs (MSR_K8_PSTATE_CTRL, etc)
> > 
> > The restriction to read and write the AMD power management MSRs is gated if 
> > the
> > domain 0 is the PM domain (so FREQCTL_dom0_kernel is set). But we can
> > relax this restriction and allow the privileged domain to read the MSRs
> > (but not write). This allows the priviliged domain to harvest the power
> > management information (ACPI _PSS states) and send it to the hypervisor.
> 
> Why would accessing these MSRs be necessary here, when it isn't
> for non-pvops? Perhaps only because you want a CPUFreq driver
> loaded?

Correct. The powernow-k8
> 
> Jan
> 
> > This patch works fine with older classic dom0 (2.6.32) and with
> > AMD K7 and K8 boxes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > diff -r aea8cfac8cf1 xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c	Thu Feb 23 13:23:02 2012 -0500
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c	Thu Feb 23 13:29:00 2012 -0500
> > @@ -2484,7 +2484,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct 
> >          case MSR_K8_PSTATE7:
> >              if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD )
> >                  goto fail;
> > -            if ( !is_cpufreq_controller(v->domain) )
> > +            if ( !is_cpufreq_controller(v->domain) && !IS_PRIV(v->domain) )
> >              {
> >                  regs->eax = regs->edx = 0;
> >                  break;
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23 22:31 [PATCH] processor passthru - upload _Cx and _Pxx data to hypervisor (v5) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/setup/pm/acpi: Remove the call to boot_option_idle_override Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen/enlighten: Expose MWAIT and MWAIT_LEAF if hypervisor OKs it Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-24 10:32   ` Jan Beulich
2012-02-24 23:52     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-27  8:14       ` Jan Beulich
2012-02-23 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/processor-passthru: Provide an driver that passes struct acpi_processor data to the hypervisor Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-24 10:23 ` [PATCH] processor passthru - upload _Cx and _Pxx data to hypervisor (v5) Jan Beulich
2012-02-24 15:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-02-25  0:21   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-27  8:19     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120224150807.GA17879@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ke.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).