From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: properly _init-annotate NMI selftest code
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224154613.GF26998@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F478C010200007800074A3D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:09:21PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> After all, this code is being run once at boot only (if configured in
> at all).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Heh. Yes, nice catch.
Ingo, I can respin this with my sign-off or just give my ACK.
Cheers,
Don
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --- 3.3-rc4/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
> +++ 3.3-rc4-x86-nmi-selftest-init/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/nmi.h>
> @@ -20,35 +21,35 @@
> #define FAILURE 1
> #define TIMEOUT 2
>
> -static int nmi_fail;
> +static int __initdata nmi_fail;
>
> /* check to see if NMI IPIs work on this machine */
> -static DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi_ipi_mask, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi_ipi_mask, NR_CPUS) __initdata;
>
> -static int testcase_total;
> -static int testcase_successes;
> -static int expected_testcase_failures;
> -static int unexpected_testcase_failures;
> -static int unexpected_testcase_unknowns;
> +static int __initdata testcase_total;
> +static int __initdata testcase_successes;
> +static int __initdata expected_testcase_failures;
> +static int __initdata unexpected_testcase_failures;
> +static int __initdata unexpected_testcase_unknowns;
>
> -static int nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> unexpected_testcase_unknowns++;
> return NMI_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void init_nmi_testsuite(void)
> +static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
> {
> /* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
> register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
> }
>
> -static void cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
> +static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
> {
> unregister_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, "nmi_selftest_unk");
> }
>
> -static int test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static int __init test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ static int test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigne
> return NMI_DONE;
> }
>
> -static void test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
> +static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
> {
> unsigned long timeout;
>
> @@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ static void test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask
> return;
> }
>
> -static void remote_ipi(void)
> +static void __init remote_ipi(void)
> {
> cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask), cpu_online_mask);
> cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
> @@ -94,19 +95,19 @@ static void remote_ipi(void)
> test_nmi_ipi(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
> }
>
> -static void local_ipi(void)
> +static void __init local_ipi(void)
> {
> cpumask_clear(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
> cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
> test_nmi_ipi(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
> }
>
> -static void reset_nmi(void)
> +static void __init reset_nmi(void)
> {
> nmi_fail = 0;
> }
>
> -static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected)
> +static void __init dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected)
> {
> testcase_fn();
> /*
> @@ -131,12 +132,12 @@ static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(v
> reset_nmi();
> }
>
> -static inline void print_testname(const char *testname)
> +static inline void __init print_testname(const char *testname)
> {
> printk("%12s:", testname);
> }
>
> -void nmi_selftest(void)
> +void __init nmi_selftest(void)
> {
> init_nmi_testsuite();
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 12:09 [PATCH] x86: properly _init-annotate NMI selftest code Jan Beulich
2012-02-24 15:46 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2012-02-27 9:38 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Properly " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224154613.GF26998@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox