From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757287Ab2B1WIO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:08:14 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57958 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753734Ab2B1WIM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:08:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
Message-Id: <20120228140810.4cf9d477.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120228120037.GD3683@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <20120228165857.5abb225e1748d40f9c5d61e8@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20120228120037.GD3683@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:37 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > -	for_each_set_bit_cont(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp,
> > +	for_each_set_bit_from(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp,
> 
> That looks about right, yes.  Not sure what the best way to handle this
> is, perhaps maintain _cont() for a while?

I don't think that will be needed - for_each_set_bit_cont() only had
two callers, both in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c.