public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:01:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120301030125.GA27070@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120301135601.a164a12e2bd4aee871ff60db@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:56:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 > Hi Dave,
 > 
 > After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
 > allmodconfig) failed like this:
 > 
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > 
 > Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
 > DVFS response latency").
 > 
 > I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.

gah, this patch was dependant upon another that didn't apply cleanly.

	Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-01  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-01  2:56 linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-01  3:01 ` Dave Jones [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-05  1:46 MyungJoo Ham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120301030125.GA27070@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox