From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030191Ab2CBOsU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:48:20 -0500 Received: from s15943758.onlinehome-server.info ([217.160.130.188]:49575 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755010Ab2CBOsS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:48:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:48:00 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , Ingo Molnar , EDAC devel , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC -v2 PATCH 0/3] RAS: Use MCE tracepoint for decoded MCEs Message-ID: <20120302144800.GA10004@aftab> References: <1330698314-9863-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <4F50DC32.10400@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F50DC32.10400@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:41:54AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > It is premature to add patch 2 for -next, as there was no agreement about > the fields to be added for the tracepoint. This is yet another proof that you're not really reading my emails: > > 1/4 in the series could go in independently since it is a cleanup, > > I'll add it to a for-next testing branch if there are no objections. This sentence clearly refers to patch 1/4, i.e. the first patch in the series. So either make sure you've really understood what you've read before replying or don't reply at all. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551